Ebola And Man Made Population Control?
 |
|
All ordinary men can see of the elites are the vapor trails they leave behind in the skies
|
Mere cogs in a giant machine! – that’s what average Americans have become in the world the elites have erected for themselves today in the United States and throughout the world. It’s a horrible thought, or at least a very uncomfortable one. It’s not the kind of notion that one readily accepts. It takes a certain kind of EPIPHANY – a kind of “awakening” – to accede to such thinking, i.e., that there exists in the United States a “complex of forces” that “ordinary people” can by no means direct or even influence — one that is seeking to destroy average people in the interest of the elite’s wellbeing and comfort.
The elites who control this “complex of forces” surround themselves and their purposes in anonymity which lends to them a ghost-like quality that is hard to “draw down on;” hard to “target.” As a result, most people — when confronting these elites – are left tilting at windmills like Don Quixote, or stabbing at phantoms that no one else can see. Like Greek gods, their abode is so much higher than that of ordinary men that the best one can see of them are the vapor trails they leave behind in the skies.
These are those about whom Professor C. Wright Mills of Columbia University raged in his book, The Power Elite –
“… in this particular epoch a conjunction of historical circumstances has led to the rise of an elite of power … the men of the circles composing this elite, severally and collectively, now make such key decisions as are made; and that, given the enlargement and the centralization of the means of power now available, the decisions that they make and fail to make carry more consequences for more people than has ever been the case in the world history of mankind.” [Please see our article, “The Elite, Money, and the End of Days.”]
THE WICKED CHARACTER OF TODAY’S ELITES
 |
| They are venomous, lethal, and very vicious! |
However, as anyone who has ever come in contact with this elite should know, one would be making a great mistake in believing that the men who constitute this elite are men of honor. THEY ARE NOT! They are small-minded men who possess no higher goal than the amassing of great wealth. Mills writes:
“… the pursuit of the moneyed-life is … [this elite’s] commanding value, in relation to which the influence of other values has declined, so … that they have easily become morally ruthless in its pursuit … [They have] narrowed the meaning of ‘success’ to big money and in these terms condemn financial failure as the chief vice, raising money to the plane of absolute value.”
These are the kind of people the Apostle Paul was describing when he said that they who would be rich drown themselves in DESTRUCTION and PERDITION –
“For the love of money is the root of ALL evil.” (1 Timothy 6:9-10)
They are venomous, lethal, and very vicious! They are double-dealing in everything they do; forever on the verge of stabbing their friends and colleagues in the back.
The Apostle Peter goes even further; he says that they are —
“… wells without water, clouds that are carried [about] with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.” (2 Pet. 2:17)
The wealth they possess is a testimony against them, and give evidence to Honoré de Balzac’s claim that –
“Behind every great fortune there lies a great crime.”
POPULATION CONTROL
As we have already suggested, the men and women who constitute this elite despise ordinary people, and it is for this precise reason that they have embraced the notion of population control (see Preface above) – meaning the reduction of the earth’s so-called “surplus population;” it plays into the elite’s morbid fear of being over-run by the “mob“ just as the French aristocracy was over-run by the French “rabble” in 1789.
 |
|
The French elite being annihilated by the “mob” in 1789.
|
Naturally enough, the elites do not “advertise” the fact that their interest in population control stems from a morose fear of the “mob;” instead, they feign an interest in population control as a means of ending poverty, hunger, child mortality, disease, etc., and saving the earth from “global warming.” But that is surely an easily-pierced subterfuge: for people who sanctify greed as a moral imperative and who stand at the forefront of robbing, looting, stealing and pillaging the wealth of the world for their personal benefit, such a feigned interest in the welfare of the poor is an absurdity; it’s preposterous on the face of it.
Nonetheless, it is a subterfuge that the elites are seriously attempting to affect — a cause célèbre embraced by such eminences as David Rockefeller, George Soros, Warren Buffet, Ted Turner, Bill Gates, etc.
A CLANDESTINE MEETING
Recently, all these men (and some women) met at the New York home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize-winning biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University.
 |
| Some of those who attended the meeting on population control at Dr. Paul Nurse’s home in Manhattan: From left to right: Rockefeller, Buffet, Bloomberg, Turner, Oprah, Soros, Gates. |
Others in attendance were real estate billionaire Eli Broad; Wall Street billionaire, Peter G. Peterson; Julian H. Robertson, Jr., hedge-fund billionaire who worked with Soros attacking the currencies of Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea and the Asian Tiger economies, precipitating the 1997-98 Asia Crisis. Also present at the first session was Patty Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Gates foundation, and John Morgridge of Cisco Systems. The group represented a combined fortune of more than $125 billion.
New York Times journalists Russell Goldman and Eileen Murphy described the circumstances surrounding the meeting and the elite status of those who attended:
“Under a cloak of secrecy, some of the world’s wealthiest people gathered in an unprecedented meeting … in New York City … They were a Who’s Who of American wealth and influence …“
THE FOCUS OF THE MEETING
According to reports, the central theme and purpose of the meeting was a concern with advancing more effectively their agenda of birth control and global population reduction, and the fact that the meeting took place in the home of Sir Paul Nurse gives evidence that this was true: Nurse is one of the world’s most renowned eugenicists, though he styles himself a geneticist rather than a eugenicist.
 |
| Kaufbeuren Euthanasia Center where the Nazis carried out “mercy killings” of the mentally ill, the crippled, etc. in the mid-1930s. |
NOTE: Eugenics is the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics). It was the science (so-called) behind Hitler’s efforts at mass euthanasia.One would have thought that given the record of eugenics during the Hitler era, this so-called “science” would have died out; but it is alive and well, and undergirds the efforts by today’s elites to control the earth’s population. For example, Ted Turner, the billionaire founder of CNN, stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon Nature Magazine that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population. One cannot help but wonder how it would be possible to create such a reduction of earth’s human population without resorting to mass euthanasia. |
Commenting on information that filtered out of the meeting, one reporter said —
“… the meeting was eerily similar to another meeting that took place on January 20, 1942, in Wansee, a Berlin suburb.
“In the Wansee Conference, high ranking Nazi officials, led by SS-Obergruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich, dispassionately discussed the more efficient methods to carry out the ‘Final solution to the Jewish question’.”
 |
| LEFT: Wansee, the mansion on the outskirts of Berlin where the Nazis planned the extermination of those people they deemed unworthy to populate planet earth. RIGHT: Rockefeller University near the home of Sir Paul Nurse where population control was discussed by the world’s elite behind closed doors. |
Naturally enough, those who make such claims — i.e., that there was (is) a similarity between the meeting at Wansee in 1944 and the one that took place at Sir Paul Nurse’s home near Rockefeller University two years ago – are DAMNED as loons by the mainline media.
MARGARET SANGER
 |
|
Margaret Sanger
|
Still, the label of eugenics seems to hang over the heads of all those who participated in the conference at Sir Paul’s home, AND NOT WITHOUT REASON: All of those who attended the conference are devotees of Margaret Sanger, a fierce proponent of eugenics as a means of controlling earth’s “surplus population.” Sanger is widely credited as the founder of modern birth control. She was recently honored by the Smithsonian for being one of the women who “challenged and changed America in the past century.” Sanger started the American Birth Control League in 1921, not necessarily as a means of providing aid to poor pregnant women, but as a means of “population control” in poor, black neighborhoods. She claimed that blacks were —
“…human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning … human beings who never should have been born.”
However, she cautioned her followers that —
“We don’t want the word out that we want to exterminate the negro population.”
 |
|
Sanger’s “Birth Control League” in the 1920s
|
Her organization was based in New York City and opened up nine branches throughout the United States (and one in British Columbia, Canada). In 1942 the American Birth Control League merged with another organization and become Planned Parenthood Foundation of America” — the term, “Planned Parenthood” being a much more innocuous and “neutral” term than the term, “Birth Control League.”
Birth control, however, was only one of the means Sanger advocated in controlling population growth. She embraced forced sterilization and “mercy killing.” Indeed, one of her most famous (infamous) quotes is —
“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
And she went on to say,
“Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty. It is a deliberate storing up of miseries for future generations. There is no greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.”
Although they would never admit it, those who gathered themselves together in Sir Paul’s home no doubt share similar feelings.
Sanger condemned charities of all kinds that sought to alleviate the suffering of the poor as a vast, complex of interrelated organizations that aimed at increasing the number of defectives, delinquents and dependents, and she went on to say:
“Such benevolence is not merely ineffectual; it is positively injurious to the community and the future of the race.”
This kind of hideous notion mirrors much of the thinking behind the effort by today’s Republican Party to eliminate such programs as “wasteful” and “futile.”
 |
|
Dr. Ernst Rudin
|
NOTE: If Sanger’s views and — ipso facto — the views of Planned Parenthood appear to mimic the views of Nazi eugenicists, it is no accident: they do! The founders of Planned Parenthood included avowed Nazi supporters like Dr. Lathrup Stoddard (who authored The Rising Tide of Color Against White Supremacy and another praising the Nazi sterilization law). They used their official publication to spread Nazi propaganda. In April of 1933, Birth Control Review published an article by Dr. Ernst Rudin, who was Hitler’s director of genetic sterilization and a founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene; in the article Dr. Rudin wrote:
“The danger to the community of the unsegregated [meaning unconfined] feeble-minded woman is more evident. Most dangerous are the middle and high grades living at large who, despite the fact that their defect is not easily recognizable, should nevertheless be prevented from procreation … In my view we should act without delay.”
 |
|
Himmler
|
The founders of Planned Parenthood printed Dr. Rudin’s article in the same year that he worked with SS chief Heinrich Himmler to draw up Germany’s 1933 sterilization law which called for the sterilization of all Jews and “colored” German children. It should be noted in this connection that the sterilization program that Rudin pioneered and Planned Parenthood supported eventually cleared the path for wholesale euthanasia in Germany. The estimated number of sterilizations was between 100,000 and 350,000. In turn, this program cleared the way for Hitler’s “Mercy Killings” of cripples, the mentally ill, etc., which in turn eventually led to Hitler’s Death Camps. One step leads to the next. |
DENIAL AS A DEFENSE
 |
|
The ghosts of Margaret Sanger and countless others of her ilk seem to swirl and surround the work of all these so-called philanthropists and humanitarians.
|
Naturally enough, all those who attended the meeting in Manhattan, would express shock that they could in any way be associated with the kinds of mass killings that were connected to Nazi Germany; their only interest is in the welfare of mankind — which is precisely what most people believe regarding the interest of such people as Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffet, etc. in the subject of population control.
It is humorous to see these people go through the psychological process of deceiving themselves — AND THIS IS CERTAINLY TRUE OF THOSE WHO REFUSE TO SEE THE CONNECTION OF ALL THOSE WHO ATTENDED THE MANHATTAN MEETING TO THE WORK OF DR. SANGER, and — concomitantly — who refuse to see the connection that Planned Parenthood has with the ideas of Nazi Germany. To their mind, these “connections” have all been adequately explained away.
Still — despite the best efforts to explain all this away — the ghosts of Margaret Sanger, Dr. Ernst Rudin, Dr. Lathrup Stoddard and countless others of their ilk seem to swirl and surround the work of all these so-called philanthropists and humanitarians — at least as it is connected to the subject of population control.
MASS EUTHANASIA
 |
|
Lurking in the background
|
All this at last brings us to mass euthanasia as a means of controlling and/or eliminating the earth’s “surplus population.” This thought, of course, elicits in most people an immediate rejection as something too terrible to contemplate. But how else is the earth’s population to be reduced to 2 billion people — or, better yet, to 225 million as Ted Turner suggests.
This is not necessarily to say that Turner or any of the rest of those who gathered at Dr. Paul Nurse’s home actually advocate — at least at this time – such a program; BUT THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT THAT THERE ARE MANY WHO LURK IN THE BACKGROUND OF SUCH MEETINGS WHO DO — and it is exactly these people who are more than willing to entertain the idea of euthanasia as a means of population control — AND ONE SHOULD BY NO MEANS UNDER-ESTIMATE THEIR POWER AND INFLUENCE. They constitute a truly toxic cabal of sinister, very menacing people who have over the years come to constitute what amounts to be a “rogue government” in the United States; a kind of “shadow regime” that wields its dark influence over the affairs of the nation — AND NONE OF THOSE WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THIS HIDDEN CABAL WOULD SHRINK AT THE THOUGHT OF MASS EUTHANASIA OF
THE WORLD’S SO-CALLED “SURPLUS POPULATION.” [Please see our articles, “The Evil in Our Midst” and “The Fourth Horseman of the Apocalypse.”]
Moreover, the fact that all those who attended the Manhattan meeting on population control have provided millions and millions of dollars to the work of Planned Parenthood gives evidence to the notion that, given the right circumstances, they could be easily persuaded to “look the other way” if such a program were instituted in the world today, especially if it were instituted under an appropriate subterfuge.
EUGENICS: THE PSEUDO-SCIENCE
THAT JUSTIFIES MASS EUTHANASIA
Getting back to the so-called science of eugenics: as we suggested earlier, most people naively believe that this pseudo-science died along with Hitler’s Third Reich; but that’s not so; indeed, it is gaining new respectability as is evidenced by the popularity of Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s 1992 best-seller, The Bell Curve.
 NOTE: The Bell Curve received a great deal of positive publicity, including cover stories in Newsweek (“the science behind [it] is overwhelmingly mainstream”), The New Republic and The New York Times Book Review. Editorials in Time Magazine, The New York Times (“makes a strong case”), Forbes, the Wall Street Journal, and the National Review all gave the book good reviews, and they went on to suggest that Herrnstein and Murray make a strong case for eugenics. In addition, the Bell Curve received a respectful airing on such shows as Nightline, the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour, the McLaughlin Group, Think Tank, PrimeTime Live, and All Things Considered. The book sold over 500,000 copies in hardcover. [We urge you to see our article on the Bell Curve, “Racism and Right-Wing Christianity: Laying the Foundations for an Attack on the Nation’s Minority Communities.”] |
 |
|
Mobs coming at the elites with clubs and pitchforks to divest them of their wealth.
|
The Bell Curve postulates the theory of dysgenesis – defined as the social process that leads to a decline in the genetic quality of a society; that is to say, as intelligent people intermarry with those of less intelligence, the genetic quality of that society degenerates since lower-intellect individuals – of all races — tend to have babies earlier and more frequently than their more intelligent contemporaries.
Herrnstein and Murray worry that if this process is not stopped, society will divide itself into a cognitive caste system which will eventually manifest itself in CLASS WARFARE; again, this is the “stuff” out from which the nightmares of the elites are fashioned — MOBS COMING AT THEM WITH CLUBS AND PITCHFORKS TO DIVEST THEM OF THEIR WEALTH. This is also what my erstwhile colleagues Doug Krieger and Dene McGriff worry about. [Please see my article on these two: “Your Blood Be upon Your Own Heads: I Am Innocent of It.”]
USING DISEASE AS A MASK TO HIDE
A PROGRAM OF MASS EUTHANASIA
The “appropriate subterfuge” for mass euthanasia — indeed, the best subterfuge – would no doubt be the sudden outbreak of a worldwide epidemic (or epidemics); this, of course, brings us to the hideous possibility of carrying out a policy of MASS EUTHANASIA UNDER COLOR OF A MASS EPIDEMIC; this certainly paints those verses in Matthew 24:7 and Luke 21:11 – which picture a morbid increase in famines and disease in the “end of days” – in a different and somber hue; i.e., that much of this increase will be man-made and very, very purposeful.
Moreover, there is a great deal of evidence that just such a program — or at least an experimental form of such a program — has already been unleashed in the “backwaters” of what passes today for “civilization.” Take, for example, what two well-known African statesmen – Kenya’s former president, Daniel Arap Moi, and South Africa’s former president, Thabo Mbeki – are saying about what’s going on in their countries; specifically, that a vicious campaign of mass euthanasia involving AIDS and Ebola and which is racially motivated has been unleashed on the African continent.
As a result of these charges, both leaders – but especially Mbeki – have come under venomous attack; but when Tony Leon, the white leader of South Africa’s Democratic Party, called Mbeki a “loon” for making such a charge, Mbeki retorted — and not without some justification –
“… that as difficult as it might be, the least you might try to do is to fight against the tendency to hold in contempt those whom white South Africa has held in and treated with contempt for many centuries.”
 |
| LEFT: Thabo Mbeki of South Africa; RIGHT: Daniel Arap Moi of Kenya |
However, well-known public health authority and author of the bestselling book “Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola, Nature, Accident or Intentional?,” Dr. Leonard Horowitz, supports both Mbeki’s and Moi’s charges; Horowitz contends that both the AIDS and EBOLA viruses were bio-engineered by scientists working for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
In addition, Horowitz concurs with both Mbeki and Moi that there is “a whole lot of racism involved here.” In a letter to both men, Horowitz wrote:
“It is likely no coincidence” that the pharmaceutical company and cancer research agencies most closely linked to these ‘man-made’ viruses, and suspected vaccines, are among the world’s leading depopulation funding sources. Viewed as population controllers, the AIDS pandemic, heavily affecting ethnic populations, is suspiciously utilitarian if not provably Malthusian.”
THE BIBLE SAYS …
What makes all this even more prescient, and even horrifying, is that there is evidence in the Bible to suggest that the creation of man-made pestilences and diseases is “FOR REAL.”
The Bible says that in the “end of days” the world will be plagued by new and exotic diseases:
“Then said he [i.e., Christ] unto them, Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom:
“And [there shall be] great earthquakes in … divers places, and famines, and pestilences (i.e., diseases, epidemics, etc.) …” (Luke 21:10-11)
We call such things (i.e., earthquakes, volcanic actions, hurricanes, etc.) “acts of God.” But what if that isn’t necessarily the case, at least insofar as disease is concerned? – what if, instead, these epidemics result as the consequence of man’s actions? What about that?
 |
|
Farrakhan
|
AIDS AND EBOLA
Again, all this brings us back to the matter of AIDS and Ebola: ever since the outbreak of the AIDS and Ebola viruses, rumors have surfaced in both the gay and black communities – the two communities that have suffered the most from these twin scourges – that AIDS and Ebola were “manufactured diseases,” the origins of which could be traced to DOD and CIA research being carried out by various American pharmaceutical companies. This belief has been endorsed by prominent African American leaders such as Louis Farrakhan, head of the Nation of Islam.
Whites, of course, would say, Well, that’s just Farrakhan, and anything he says should be discounted. But it’s not just Farrakhan.
 |
|
LEFT: AIDS patient; RIGHT: Ebola patient
|
Indeed, a survey of about 1,000 African American church members in five cities (all of them sincere, born-again Christians) found that more than one-third of them believed the AIDS virus was produced in a germ warfare laboratory and has been used to kill off African Americans by white racists bent on wresting the country away from “multiculturalists” and taking it back to the days of “Father Knows Best” and “Leave It To Beaver” – a time when white, European, Christian values dominated the cultural landscape. Another third said they were “unsure” whether AIDS was created to kill African Americans. That left only one-third of the black community who disputed the theory.
 |
| Many Bible-believing black church-goers in the United States believe AIDS and Ebola are man-made diseases that aim at “killing-off” the black population. |
 |
|
Dr. Quinn
|
These findings held firm even among educated blacks, said one of the authors of the survey, Sandra Crouse Quinn, a health educator for the School of Public Health at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill. DOD (Department of Defense) and the CIA have been livid in their denials, but the Rev. Joseph Lowery, former president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, cited the “Tuskegee Experiment” as grounds for cynicism in the black community about government denials as to the validity of the rumors – a reference to a syphilis study carried out by the U.S. government (1932 to 1972) in which treatment was withheld from 399 poor African American men with the disease so health officials could study the affliction’s pathology – and then lied to the American public about the study’s existence.
 |
| The Tuskegee Experiment (1932-1972) was a 40-year American government study of the effects of untreated syphilis on black men. “Untreated” is the key word: when a cure for the disease was found in the 1940s, none of the men were allowed to receive it, not even to save their lives or stop them from going mad. It sounds like some cruel Nazi experiment. And yet it went on even after laws were passed in the late 1940s to prevent Nazi-like experiments! Of the 399 men in the study 128 died directly or indirectly from the disease. They spread it to 40 of their wives who in turn gave it to 19 of their children. |
Nonetheless, white evangelicals continue to discount these rumors. Indeed, there is an unexpressed but nagging feeling among many white evangelicals that the AIDS and Ebola viruses are God’s judgment on both communities: the blacks insofar as what they (i.e., white evangelicals) naively and cruelly see as their (i.e., the blacks’) “lazy, do-nothing, welfare mentality;” and the gays insofar as their homosexuality.
The judgment of God? Oh! – really? Well, maybe we should back up a little and take a closer look at the real situation. We may find out that the suspicions of the black and gay communities are not that far off the mark. [We URGE you to see our article, “The Drug Epidemic, Viruses, Ebola and AIDS — It’s Not What You think,” for a “run-down” as to why the homosexual and back communities were targeted.]
SCIENTISTS BEGIN TO
ACCEDE TO THE RUMORS
The fact of the matter is, by the mid to late 1980s a growing number of scientists began taking these rumors to heart. At first, most who did so came from the Communist World. For example, on March 11, 1988 the Moscow World News Service aired an article lending credence to the belief that AIDS and Ebola were “manufactured diseases.” The broadcast was later published in its entirety in the Soviet magazine, International Affairs.
The report cited a West German company named OTRAG (which was connected to and financed by the CIA) for having conducted virus experiments in Zaire that had allegedly led to the development of “a mutant virus that would be a human killer.”
On January 24, 1991 the Havana International News Service made the same claim. The titles of the two articles read respectively, “Belitskiy on How, Where AIDS Virus Originated,” and “(East) German Claims AIDS Created by Pentagon.”
 |
| Site of OTRAG hidden deep in the Congo |
NOTE: OTRAG (German: Orbital Transport und Raketen AG, or Orbital Transport and Rockets, Inc.), was ostensibly a German company based in Stuttgart that planned in the late 1970s and early 1980s to develop a new kind of propulsion system for rockets. The experiments for these rockets were supposed to have been carried out in the Congo (then known as Zaire). However, no rockets of any kind were ever developed there, and there exists today a good deal of evidence that OTRAG was nothing more than a “mask” behind which the CIA carried out research in the development of man-made diseases. The site has since been abandoned, and all traces of it have been destroyed. |
It wasn’t long, however, before doctors and scientists in the West started examining the evidence that the Soviets and the Cubans had amassed, and – as a result – began reaching similar conclusions: for example, John Seale in London, Maneul Servin in Mexico, and Jacobo Segal in Berlin. But with the collapse of Communism and the chaos that followed, nothing much ever came of those accusations, and while these stories continued to generate a great deal of “play” in the black and gay communities, most Americans didn’t pay much attention – after all, who cared about the gays and the blacks anyway? – or so many whites (behind closed doors) thought.
SUSPICIONS GROW
 |
|
Dr. W. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the University of Southern California and Director of the Center for Complex Infectious Diseases.
|
Today, however — twenty years after the confusion engendered by the collapse of communism – a growing number of scientists whose research cannot be tainted by the “pinko” label, have begun to surface who think that there may be more to the origins of the AIDS and Ebola viruses than has been made public by the American government and the American pharmaceutical companies. For example, Dr. W. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the University of Southern California and Director of the Center for Complex Infectious Diseases, writes:
“All at once, new viruses and virus-related diseases have threatened the health of humans and many animal species. How did this situation arise? Could it be that scientific studies and the emergence of new pathogens are not totally unrelated events? … Open debate on this issue has been soundly discouraged [by the government and the many pharmaceutical companies involved in this research]. Opponents to open dialogue … argue that little good, and considerable harm would come from a full disclosure of the facts. Exposing the truth, many believe, would likely: 1) tarnish the reputations of certain scientists, 2) make it more difficult to maintain science funding, 3) promote antigovernment sentiment, and 4) likely leave many issues unresolved.”
What Dr. Martin was suggesting here is that – government protestations to the contrary notwithstanding – there indeed may exist a sinister and very malignant connection between much of the scientific research that certain multinational pharmaceutical companies (Merck, Litton Bionetics, Sandoz, etc.) have been engaged in over the last thirty to forty years (largely at the instigation of the U.S. government, specifically DOD and the CIA) and the emergence of certain deadly viruses which had never been heard of before (for example, AIDS, Marburg, Ebola, etc.) – not exactly something to sneeze at coming from someone of the scientific stature of Dr. Martin. [Once again, for more information on this subject, we URGE you to see our article, “The Drug Epidemic, Viruses, Ebola and AIDS: It’s Not What You Think.”]
All this, of course, lends a certain very dark hue to the Manhattan Meeting that took place at Dr. Nurse’s home — AND MORE THAN THAT, IT REVEALS A LOT ABOUT THOSE FORCES WHO LURK IN THE SHADOWS CAST BY THE LIKES OF BILL GATES, DAVID ROCKEFELLER, GEORGE SOROS, WARREN BUFFET, ETC.
THE CONSTANT GARDENER
The appearance of the film, The Constant Gardener, in 2005 popularized the growing belief in academic circles concerning the origins of AIDS and Ebola. Although the film did not deal with this subject matter per se, it went a long way in publicizing the wicked (no other word suffices) participation of American (and British) pharmaceutical companies in drug experimentation using unsuspecting African populations as human “guinea pigs.”
 |
|
The Constant Gardener
|
The film was directed by Fernando Meirelles. The screenplay by Jeffrey Caine is based on the John le Carré novel of the same name. It tells the story of Justin Quayle, a man who seeks to find the motivating forces behind his wife’s murder – which was that she had discovered that Western pharmaceutical companies supported by Western governments were using unsuspecting Africans to test experimental drugs.
The plot was based on a real-life case in Kano, Nigeria where the Pfizer Company experimented with the drug, Trovan. By the time the trial ended, 200 children were disabled and 11 were dead.
In connection with this debacle, a Nigerian state judge issued arrest warrants for three top Pfizer officials. According to the government, the drug trials were carried out without the informed consent of the children’s parents or the Nigerian government.
But United States-based Pfizer said that it would fight the arrest warrants and seek to block their implementation. This follows Pfizer’s attempts in November to avoid prosecution by securing an injunction to prevent police from arraigning any company officials on federal charges. “What Pfizer has done is what a former governor did to stop EFCC (i.e., the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission) from prosecuting them,” said government lawyer Babatunde Irukera. “They went to Lagos state, where there is no action pending, to procure an exparte order to stop the police from taking steps to serve criminal summons on its officials.”
In the end, there can be little doubt that Pfizer — in one way or another — will win, and the company officers involved in the so-called “drug trials” will get off “scott-free.” This is the way the world works today under the auspices of the American new World Order System.
 |
|
Kano, Nigeria
|
As we earlier suggested, the film skirted the issue of euthanasia — that would have brought the wrath of not only the British and American governments down on their heads, but also the wrath or the world’s pharmaceutical companies; but what it did do is show the kind of banality with which the world’s drug companies and the elites who govern the Western World view Africans — WHICH, NATURALLY ENOUGH, MAKES THEM THE PERFECT SUBJECTS FOR EXPERIMENTATION INTO DEVELOPING THE BEST MEANS OF MASS EUTHANASIA USING DISEASE AS A COVER.
THE SLOAN FOUNDATION
The original “movers and shakers” behind the modern-day movement of population reduction derived much of their funding from the Rockefeller-controlled Sloan Foundation; and an examination of the files of the foundation yields a morbid look into the kind of thinking that animated much or the research that we have been discussing. Moreover, it gives evidence as to the disdain the elites have for gays and blacks — the human “guinea pigs” used in much of this experimentation.
The evidence found that the Sloan Foundation:
-
Supported black educational initiatives consistent with the COINTELPRO Black Nationalist Hate Group campaign. [For an close examination of this disdain, please see our article, “Measuring the Depravity of the Elites.”]
-
Administered mass-media-public-persuasion experiments completely consistent with the CIA’s Project MK-ULTRA efforts to develop brainwashing technologies and drugs to affect large populations. [Please see our article, “MK-ULTRA: the Search for the Manchurian Candidate.”]
-
Funded much of the earliest cancer research involving the genetic engineering of mutant viruses. [Please see our article, “The Drug Epidemic, Viruses, Ebola and AIDS — It’s Not What You Think.”]
-
Began major funding of the National Academy of Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (for neuroscience and molecular genetics research), the Salk Institute (for viral research), and the Scientists Institute for Public Information between 1968 and 1970.
-
Funded population control studies by Planned Parenthood-World Population, New York, N.Y.
-
Funded the Community Blood Council of Greater New York, Inc., the council of doctors who established the infamous New York City Blood Bank which allowed more than 10,000 hemophiliacs and countless others to become infected with HIV because they allegedly didn’t want to spend $150 million to screen the blood.
-
Maintained Laurence S. Rockefeller, the director of the Community Blood Council of Greater New York the international blood bankers and the president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, as chairman of the board of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and a trustee for the Sloan Foundation.
-
Maintained among its marketable securities, 16,505 shares of Chase Manhattan Bank stock (in 1967, which it apparently sold by 1970 probably to avoid conflict of interest charges) along with 24,400-53,000 shares issued by Merck & Co., Inc. (the company whose President, George W. Merck, was director of America’s biological weapons industry, and whose hepatitis B and polio vaccines most plausibly transmitted AIDS throughout the world).
 |
ALFRED SLOAN
Alfred P. Sloan, who founded the Sloan Foundation, was the long-time president of General Motors. He was an ardent admirer of Adolph Hitler, and his hatred of the Jews paralleled in almost every respect the thinking of Ford – though he was a little more discreet in expressing it; his hatred of blacks was almost as intense as his hatred for the Jews. In Sloan hosted a get-together of millionaires and industrialists at Ashville, North Carolina. The subject of the meeting was “Hitler: A Christian Bulwark Against Atheistic Socialism.” Sloan also frequently visited Berlin where he hobnobbed with Goering and Hitler.
|
Very obviously, the interest of those connected to the Rockefeller nexus (which includes the Sloan Foundation) in population reduction is a very long-standing one and extends back to their involvement with the WHO (World Health Organization) in the in the development of a mysterious “new vaccine” in the 1950s.
The results of the WHO-Rockefeller project were put into mass application on human guinea pigs in the early 1990′s. The WHO oversaw the use of this “mysterious vaccine” in massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.
But the “whistle was blown” (as it were) on this series of vaccination campaigns when the Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious of the motives behind the WHO program and decided to test numerous vials of the vaccine and found them to contain human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, or hCG. That was a curious component for a vaccine designed to protect people against lock-jaw arising from infection with rusty nail wounds or other contact with certain bacteria found in soil. The tetanus disease was indeed, also rather rare. It was also curious because hCG was a natural hormone needed to maintain a pregnancy. However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, it stimulated formation of antibodies against hCG, rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, a form of concealed abortion.
Similar reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones were introduced by the Rockefeller nexus into the Philippines and Nicaragua.
THE MOVING FORCE BEHIND
TODAY’S INTEREST IN EUGENICS
While the Rockefeller Foundation remains as involved as ever in population control, their efforts have been eclipsed today by Bill Gate who has been greatly supported in this endeavor by Warren Buffet. Buffet recently donated most of his fortune to the Gates Foundation in furtherance of eugenics. Well-known journalist F. William Engdahl explains:
“Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. But in a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.”
 |
|
Bill and Melinda Gates and the Gates Foundation
|
Engdahl recounts remarks Gates made in a speech concerning population control with the unnerving title of “Innovating to Zero!” The gathering was an invitation-only “TED2010 Conference” held in Long Beach, California. Engdahl writes,
“Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, ‘First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent’.”
 |
|
Using vaccines to reduce the world’s population
|
Engdahl continues:
“In plain English, one of the most powerful men in the world states clearly that he expects vaccines to be used to reduce population growth.”
Engdahl says that what Gates is doing is channeling billions of dollars through the Gates Foundation into various population control and reduction programs in the developing world. The programs are masked as philanthropy that aims at providing health services for poor Africans. In reality these programs involve involuntary population sterilization via vaccination and other medicines that make women of child-bearing age infertile.
These programs have met with enormous indigenous resistance. Health experts point out that if the intent of Gates was really to improve the health and well-being of black Africans, the same hundreds of millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in untested and unsafe vaccines could be used in providing minimal sanitary water and sewage systems. Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would increase the population of Africa rather than decrease it, which is what Gates and his cohorts really want.
ARE YOU SURPRISED?
You’re surprised that the rich are capable of such things? That they are infected with so much depravity? Well, you shouldn’t be in light of the New Testament.
It’s not without reason that Jesus said of the rich:
“Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.
“And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” (Matthew 19:23-24)
| [And one should take note of the fact that the “needle” referred to here is a SEWING needle, not some imaginary door in one of Jerusalem’s gates – a story made up by rich Christians out of “whole cloth” to soften the effect of the Lord’s words here.] |
Indeed, Jesus was so “turned off” by the rich, that the Bible says that in His coming Kingdom, He will:
“He will fill the hungry with good things; but the rich he will send empty away.” Luke 1:53)
And He went on to say:
“Woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
“Woe unto you that are full! for ye shall hunger. Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye shall mourn and weep.
“Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets.” (Luke 6:24-26)
Very obviously, then – at least according to the Bible – the elites are very, very capable of the kind of depravity described in this article.
These are very dangerous and despicable men and women, despite the fact that they are well-dressed, well, coifed, well educated, well spoken of, and smell good – these men and women who stand guard over such corporations as General Electric, Ford, General Motors, Boeing, Exxon-Mobil, etc.
 |
|
People who glory in appearance, and not in heart.
|
This is the truth of the matter, and even secularists recognize that fact.
You don’t believe this? Then surely you are one of those who –
“… glories in appearance, and not in heart.” (2 Cor. 5:12)
As a result, there is no possibility for you to come to grips with the evil that is at this present moment engulfing ALL of mankind like some kind of noxious mist emanating from a dirty, polluted swamp. Truly we are immersed in dark times, and the Bible counsels us –
“… to … anoint our eyes with eyesalve, that we may see.” (Revelation 3:18)
Bob Unruh About | Email | Archive
Greyeagle News Forum: Exposing The Religious Machine In America And One World Ambitions 